The token swap ratio has not yet been defined. There is a lot of interest in knowing the ratio and how the process will work. The ratio and instructions for completing the swap will be announced once we reach that point.
1000:1, 10000:1 swap is good.
The general public makes a deal based on the amount of issuance.
For more public participation, for speciality, for more hifi communities.
What is the basis for your opinion regarding token swap ratios? Could you give an example? 
Hello Josue Boss. Nice to meet u. Iām korean user.
I have 2 reason why we have to over 100:1.
I think 100:1 and 1000:1 are better than 10:1.
The first reason is in the upbit price. The price of Upbit now is approximately 6 KRW. When it reaches 10KRW during the bullish market in the future, the unit of 10.1KRW 10.2KRW will be heavy at one unit price. Also, even if the 10:1 ratio is maintained, the unit price of 100KRW 101KRW is also heavy. But if the ratio is over 100:1, the unit of asking is lighter.
As you know, Upbit is one of the most important exchanges that keeps most of the mft.
The second reason is that our goal is a billion dollar market. As shown on the roadmap, our goal is to lead the market for nft defi worth $1 billion. But the current dollar price is roughly 0.004. This is a low price that is less attractive to investors. At least $0.4 or $4 is the shortcut to reaching the investment attractiveness and eventually the $1 billion goal.
We Korean users are waiting for Token Swap . We look forward to the completion of the vote and a successful swap in the fourth quarter of 2022 as the roadmap.
1000:1, 10000:1 swap is good.
The general public makes a deal based on the amount of issuance. For more public participation, for speciality, for more hifi communities.
If you do 10000:1 swap, Speciality that only 1 million people out of 8 billion people can have. If each person has one
This is going to be a good marketing
It will be a big growth for the Hifi community.
The total amount of 10 million is indeed a temptation for investors, because everyone knows that there are 21 million bitcoins. And the $4 price is especially cheap. 1000ļ¼1 is a good ratio
When prices are too low, many investors tend to think that tokens are not worth it.
Higher prices make management easier.
For example, NASDAQās SQQQ proceeds with 6 reverse stock split, It was 6400:1 in total.
Hifi is a time to attract public attention. Itās time for a clear and special act.
I suggest 10000:1 swap.
As the unit to be swapped becomes smaller,
It becomes difficult to trade on a BTC/ETH pair with a large base unit
Therefore, the swap should proceed at least 1000:1 or higher.
bet!
Thank you so much for the insights. All the details about the token swap will be published on both languages English and Korean in the blog.
The proposal will be introduced in the forum. 
I am referencing the comment above here from Kimās123. I suppose I wanna become more familiar with how it would impact perception on the South Korean market, because they are such big holders.1000:1 (~4.00 usd), 100:1 (~.40 usd) or 10:1 (~.04 usd). Ultimately itās all about market cap, though still what is the best compromise that can be established & why?
Is it purely subjective w/ no right answer?
Is the logic to move it inversely from where it is now because it was designed w/ a different utility in-mind and also through time moved off some exchanges (correct?), because it was so small of a denomination?
Kims123 ā Ca you dig down a little bit more and just give some specifics of why you are proposing the ratio you are; possibly we should all download a currency converter, so we can get a better understanding of derivative # denomination of south korean conversion decimals, relative to the reverse split ratio proposals & itās effect/ impact.
Itās definitely a factor to consider.
Hello 
I have been interested in cryptocurrency since 2016 and have been investing in the market until now.
The token is currently traded at 5.7 under the name of MFT on Upbit in Korea. And more than 80% of the total volume is traded at Upbit in Korea.
In Korea, there are many people who want short-term profits between 10krw~12krw, 100krw~120krw, 1000krw~1200krw .They are repeatedly buying and selling, focusing on their own interests rather than token growth.
For this reason, the market capitalization of many tokens has not increased significantly and has not shown growth. Even if the market is revitalized in the future and more participants are interested in the future, it will not be easy to exceed the price range I exemplified.
Thatās why Koreans talking about a ratio of more than 1000:1.
Thank you for reading it and I hope that Token Swap will achieve great results
I understand that Pawn bots can be used as collateral when they are worth more than 1 ether. So why donāt we also push the hifi up to a similar price range and make it a 1:1:1 ratio? Swap ratio of approximately 300000:1.
Thank you for the insights. More details about the token swap will be published at the blog.
Are there any examples of what you are saying using another lending protocol or NFTs as collateral?
I think 10:1 ($.045) or 100:1 ($.45), w/ a preference of 10:1 ā just because it gives us room to grow. I think 10:1 gives us the most room to grow via perceptiob. just because I think we are going to grow quickly (and I understand itās just perception, though I feel like thereās some Pavlovian thing that will make people want to move it from 4 1/2 cents to a dollar;ā); and Iām talking post swap. whereas if itās already at $.45 then ā I think we miss out on some of the compound growth ((maybe not)), I def. donāt think we should go any more than 100:1 though. people are throwing out 1000 and I just think itās like come on, letās do a slow and steady curve.
We need to look at the current state of the Crypto market. The current Crypto market is in very bad conditions. It will stay at a price much lower than the price range calculated simply mathematically. It is difficult to succeed at a ratio of 10:1,100:1.
So I strongly recommend the ratio of 1000:1.
1,000:1
To maximize HIFI value, it strongly recommends to vote Min. 1,000:1
Most of people did just calculate mathematic by deduction of quantities tokens & price, based on swap ratio⦠thatās NOT good to approach ways.
Please check similar cases of other projects⦠most likely they suggested & decided 1,000:1 // 10,000:1ā¦
As a member of the community, I also support at least 100:1. In terms of price accessibility and commission, I think 10:1 is a bad merger ratio. Investors did not wait for the 10:1 ratio. In the long run, I think itās at least 100:1 even if you think about price accessibility (if you want to buy it, but you want to invest coins that donāt look like a scam). I am proposing to assume a ratio from 100:1 or higher.
I appreciate you sharing your thoughts regarding the token swap ratio. What other thoughts about the token swap do you have that could benefit the community?
Same here, Iām fine with 100:1. If the TVL grew substantially, we would see price appreciation as well.